Hermitage Health and Life Insurance Co. v. Cagle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that statutes that apply to an insurance policy not only become a part of the contract, but also “supersede anything in the policy repugnant to the provisions of the statute”
• finding that statutes that apply to an insurance policy not only become a part of the contract, but also “supersede anything in the policy repugnant to the provisions of the statute”
• a case in which the defendant made the same contention under the same circumstances
• “It is a well established rule of law in this state that any statute applicable to an insurance policy becomes part of the policy and such statutory provisions override and supersede anything in the policy repugnant to the provisions of the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).