Hermann v. Parsons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding plaintiff engaged in a protected activity by 7 using her intermittent FMLA leave every Friday
• triable issue of material fact whether iPhone applications “drained” plaintiffs’ batteries and used up storage space and bandwidth
• “[N]one of the 27 Plaintiffs presents evidence that he or she even saw, let alone read and relied upon, the alleged 28 misrepresentations[.]”
• to establish actual reliance, plaintiffs “must have seen the misrepresentations and taken some action based on what they saw”
• “Plaintiffs must have seen the misrepresentations and taken some action based on what they saw—that is, Plaintiffs must have actually relied on the misrepresentations to have been harmed by them.”
• vague testimony as to plaintiffs’ 1 allegedly were made insufficient to establish standing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).