Herman v. Valley Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, although the insurer was not required to “remind” the plaintiff of “the suit limitation provision in her policy,” it nonetheless did so
• noting insurer’s repeated warnings that it would not waive its rights under insurance policy and that no waiver or estoppel was intended or should be implied
• holding “the rule that an insurer must show prejudice before it can deny coverage for failure to receive timely notice of a claim by its insured has no applicability in the context of suit limitation provisions,” which serve a similar purpose as claims-made-and-reported policies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).