Herman v. Mid-Atlantic Installation Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that cable installers can control their own profits and losses “by improving their technique so that they can service more customers faster”
• noting that a self determined opportunity for profit or loss due to per service payments indicates contractor status
• noting that cable installers can control their own profits and losses \by improving their technique so that they can service more customers faster\
• noting that cable installers can control their own profits and losses “by improving their technique so that they can service more customers faster”
• finding that “[r]equiring installers to wear uniforms and ID badges identifying themselves with [the defendants] does not make them employees” because (1) it was required by the county; and (2
• weighing factor strongly in favor of independent contractor status where installers made considerable investments in their own vehicles, specialty tools, and insurance premiums

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).