Herman v. Meiselman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a common nucleus of the same “set of facts may give rise to multiple counts” but will nonetheless represent “one cause of action” for purposes of res judicata
• stating that “[f]inality of the judgment is satisfied by the issuance of a default judgment” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).