Herman v. Herman
Citations
- 2019 ND 248
Syllabus
N.D.C.C. § 59-10.1-03(1) requires receipt of the notice, proven through the presumption or otherwise, to begin the 120 day limitation period. The presumption under N.D.C.C. § 59-10.1-03(1) is rebuttable. It was an abuse of discretion for a district court to deny time for additional discovery under N.D.R.Civ.P. 56(f) when the motion for summary judgment was filed within four days of the service of the complaint and the motion for summary judgment was resolved as the result of a material fact established through a presumption.
Judges: Jensen, Jon J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Choice Financial Group v. SchellpfefferNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-04-25· cited 26×
- State v. BearrunnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-01-22· cited 14×
- Horob v. Farm Credit Services of North Dakota ACANorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-06-25· cited 12×
- Horob v. Farm Credit Services of N.D.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-01-12· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.