Skip to main content
· 7/15/1879

Herman v. Edson

Citations

  • 9 Neb. 152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming reversal of a summary judgment in favor of the defendant railroad company because the plaintiff police officer was injured in a railroad right-of-way that the defendant company was statutorily obligated to keep in good repair for the benefit of all members of the public
  • affirming reversal of a summary judgment in favor of the defendant railroad company because the plaintiff police officer was injured in a railroad right-of-way that the defendant company was statutorily obligated to keep in good repair for the benefit of all the members of the public
  • policeman treated as invitee because land was held open for use of the public, where, in the course of duty, he entered a railroad right of way
  • policeman treated as invitee because land was held open for use of the public, where, in the course of duty, he entered a railroad right of way

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maxwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.