Skip to main content
· 7/28/2000

Herman Roberts v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration

Citations

  • 222 F.3d 466
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18195
  • 2000 WL 1036208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a party objecting to a magistrate judge’s R&R may not “make arguments in his objections . . . when those arguments have been neither argued to the magistrate judge nor addressed in the judge’s report”
  • unless manifest injustice would result, claim not raised in district court is subject to forfeiture on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Murphy, Goldberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.