Herman Harmon v. Calvin D. Auger, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a single, uncorroborated EMIT test is admissible in a prison disciplinary setting
• holding that a prisoner does not have a liberty interest in contact visits
• holding that a prisoner does not have a liberty interest in contact visits
• a positive EMIT test confirmed by a second EMIT test or its equivalent satisfies due process
• EMIT test results are ninety-five per cent (95%) accurate and form a sufficient basis for disciplinary action
• EMIT test results are ninety-five per cent (95%) accurate and form a sufficient basis for disciplinary action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).