Heritage Creek Development Corp. v. Colonial Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an ad showing the incorrect plat book number did not void the sale because the error did not contribute to chilling the sale price or voiding the advertisement
• “Not every irregularity or deficiency in a foreclosure advertisement will void a sale”
• plaintiff “did not produce even a scintilla of evidence which shows any wrongdoing by the bank, or that any act or omission by the bank caused [plaintiff] to lose its equity in the eight lots which were sold in foreclosure”
• technical default in a foreclosure advertisement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).