Heriot v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that where evidence was uncontroverted and undisputed, remand for additional factfinding was not necessary
• court will overlook technical defect if it is clear from assignment which findings are challenged
• “We will not . . . remand for further factfinding when to do so would be a useless act, e.g., where there is undisputed, competent evidence in the record supporting a party’s claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).