Hergott v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• 'The purpose of § 12-21-222 was to ensure that the testimony of a guilty party testifying in return for leniency from the state would not alone be sufficient to convict another. An accomplice's testimony must be corroborated before a conviction of felony could be had.'
• 'The purpose of § 12-21-222 was to ensure that the testimony of a guilty party testifying in return for leniency from the state would not alone be sufficient to convict another. An accomplice's testimony must be corroborated before a conviction of felony could be had.'

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ex Parte Scott
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1998-03-20· cited 46×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2012-02-10· cited 3×
• Travon Romance Williams v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court: CC-18-110)
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2024-08-23
• Corey Ramon Davis v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Marengo Circuit Court: CC-09-102)
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2025-01-17

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ex Parte Bankhead
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1991-05-24· cited 312×
• Andrews v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1979-02-20· cited 89×
• Ex Parte Hergott
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1991-06-14· cited 38×
• Lewis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-10-12· cited 12×
• Hergott v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1988-07-19· cited 8×
• Hergott v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-09-21· cited 5×