Herff Jones, Inc. v. Girouard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that sexual assault convictions were permissible, ‘‘irrespective of the brief period of time separating them’’
• ‘‘[f]light, when unexplained, tends to prove a con- sciousness of guilt . . . [and] is a form of circumstan- tial evidence’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• conviction of two counts of sexual assault was permissible, ‘‘irrespective of the brief period of time separating them’’
• ‘‘the fact that ambiguities or explanations may exist [that] tend to rebut an inference of guilt does not render evidence of flight inadmissible but simply constitutes a factor for the jury’s consideration’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).