Skip to main content
· 2/3/1999

Herendeen v. Michigan State Police

Citations

  • 39 F. Supp. 2d 899
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3581
  • 1999 WL 166843

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring in cases of “reverse discrimination” a showing of circumstances that the respondent “is that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority”
  • declining to apply pattern or practice evidentiary proof method to individual discrimination claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quist

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.