· 2/3/1999
Herendeen v. Michigan State Police
Citations
- 39 F. Supp. 2d 899
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3581
- 1999 WL 166843
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring in cases of “reverse discrimination” a showing of circumstances that the respondent “is that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority”
- declining to apply pattern or practice evidentiary proof method to individual discrimination claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Quist
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.