Herencia v. Guzman
Citations
- 219 U.S. 44
- 31 S. Ct. 135
- 55 L. Ed. 81
- 1910 U.S. LEXIS 2077
Syllabus
<p>It is not the province of this court on'writ of error to reverse if dissatisfied with the verdict of the jury; if there was evidence proper for the consideration of the jury, objection that the verdict was against the weight of evidence or that excessive damages were allowed cannot be considered.</p> <p>An amendment to a bill of exceptions, after bond on appeal had been given and approved, so as to make the record conform to the fact as to the conditions under which certain testimony introduced by plaintiff in error on the trial was given, held not error, as it was not un- ■ justified or objected to and the exception related simply to the inclusion of such testimony in the record.</p> <p>A judgment cannot be set aside on an exception to the refusal of the trial court to allow an expert to testify where the record does not show what testimony the witness was expected to give or that he was qualified to give any.</p>
Judges: Hughes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court· 1933-01-09· cited 354×
- Southern Railway-Carolina Division v. BennettSupreme Court· 1914-04-06· cited 122×
- Hoffman v. PalmerSecond Circuit· 1942-07-31· cited 119×
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1947-09-06· cited 57×
- Maurizio D. Fortunato v. Ford Motor CompanySecond Circuit· 1972-07-10· cited 51×
- Scott v. Baltimore & OR Co.Third Circuit· 1945-08-14· cited 44×
- Clarence Evans and Katherine Evans v. United States of America, Chester Parker v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1964-01-30· cited 39×
- Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. YountEighth Circuit· 1933-07-26· cited 37×
- Love v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1944-04-19· cited 36×
- Gantz v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1942-04-28· cited 36×
- Pariser v. City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 1945-01-03· cited 35×
- Phoenix Railway Co. v. LandisSupreme Court· 1913-12-22· cited 34×
- Toledo, St. L. & W. R. v. HoweSixth Circuit· 1911-11-07· cited 23×
- New York, N. H. & H. R. Co. v. ZermaniFirst Circuit· 1952-12-19· cited 19×
- Hass v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1929-02-25· cited 19×
- Chicago & E. R. v. PonnSixth Circuit· 1911-11-07· cited 19×
- Texas Pacific-Missouri Pacific Terminal R. Of New Orleans v. WelshFifth Circuit· 1950-02-08· cited 17×
- McVeigh v. McGurrenSeventh Circuit· 1940-12-27· cited 17×
- Miller v. United StatesThird Circuit· 1943-08-13· cited 16×
- Kuttroff v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1925-04-20· cited 14×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.