Heredia v. Heyman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• looking to whether issues were “unique” and “novel,” rather than common, to assess the issues at stake in the context of a discovery dispute (citation omitted)
• “[C]ost-shifting is appropriate only where electronic discovery imposes an undue burden or expense.”
• party should not be entitled to shift the costs of restoring and searching data that it converted into an inaccessible format at a time when it should have anticipated litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).