Herbstein v. Bruetman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “On the merits, we affirm for the reasons given by the district judge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Backlund v. Stanley-Snow (In Re Stanley-Snow)
  First Circuit· 2009-05-06· cited 40×
• 6050 Grant, LLC v. Hanson (In Re Hanson)
  N.D. Illinois· 2010-10-05· cited 13×
• City of Chi. v. Spielman (In re Spielman)
  N.D. Illinois· 2018-08-06· cited 10×
• Kontos v. Manevska (In re Manevska)
  N.D. Illinois· 2018-08-08· cited 7×
• In re Johnson
  N.D. Illinois· 2012-10-11· cited 6×
• Homestead Holdings, Inc. v. Wellington (In Re PTI Holding Corp.)
  D. Nevada· 2006-07-19· cited 5×
• Seibert v. Cedar Rapids Lodge & Suites, LLC
  D. Maine· 2018-04-10· cited 4×
• Sharifeh v. Fox (In re Sharif)
  N.D. Illinois· 2016-04-25· cited 2×
• In re Sharif
  N.D. Illinois· 2017-02-16· cited 2×
• Deady v. Hanson (In Re Hanson)
  N.D. Illinois· 2010-10-14· cited 1×
• Shriners Hospital for Children v. Bauman (In re Bauman)
  N.D. Illinois· 2012-02-08· cited 1×
• Bruetman v. Herbstein
  Supreme Court· 2002-10-07
• Buscone v. Botelho
  First Circuit· 2025-04-02

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Herbstein v. Bruetman
  N.D. Illinois· 2001-09-06· cited 29×
• Herbstein v. Bruetman (In Re Bruetman)
  N.D. Illinois· 2001-03-08· cited 11×
• Diego J. Herbstein v. Martin E. Bruetman
  Seventh Circuit· 2001-02-21· cited 7×