District Court of Appeal of Florida· 10/1/2014
Herbst v. Herbst
Citations
- 153 So. 3d 290
- 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 15244
- 2014 WL 4851687
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reviewing \the trial court's interpretation of the [marital settlement agreement] de novo\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Silberman, Morris, Sleet
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Estate of Williams and PernaColorado Court of Appeals· 2017-09-07· cited 2×
- JONI BARTOLOTTA v. ALAN BARTOLOTTADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-02-28
- BETH HELMICK, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS ASSIGNEE OF CATHARINE ANDERMAN v. AARON M. TAYLORDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-04-03
- Stamler v. StamlerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-04-11
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- O'MALLEY v. Pan Am. Bank of OrlandoSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-05-08· cited 38×
- Hannon v. HannonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-02· cited 14×
- Porter v. PorterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-04· cited 6×
- Farrar v. KeyserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-07-09· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.