Skip to main content
· 6/16/1987

Herbik v. Rand

Citations

  • 732 S.W.2d 232
  • 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining defendants, to support dissolution, must have “acted with an intent to subserve some outside purpose, regardless of the consequences to the company, and in a manner inconsistent with its interests” (emphasis omitted)
  • shareholder oppression claim against company

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pudlowski, Crandall, Karohl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.