HERBERT JERRIDO v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “under Florida law, the centerline presumption applies to the railroad right-of-way” at issue in the above captioned cases
• holding Florida’s centerline presumption of high- ways and streets apply to railroads, and noting “[m]any other jurisdictions—very much the predominant number among those whose law has been cited to us—have applied the centerline presumption to railroad rights-of- way”
• applying state law to interpret plat reservations to determine ownership of parcels in the railroad corridor
• “We analyze the property rights of the parties in a rails-to- trails case under the relevant state’s law . . . .”
• “We analyze the property rights of the parties in a rails-to-trails case under the relevant state’s law . . . .”
• “[T]he government must provide just compensation to the owner of the reversionary rights eliminated by a Trails Act conversion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).