Skip to main content
· 2/2/1972

Herbert E. Theilmann, Administrator of Herbert K. Theilmann v. The Rutland Hospital, Inc., and Dr. Donald D. Dingman

Citations

  • 455 F.2d 853
  • 20 A.L.R. Fed. 482
  • 15 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1311
  • 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11514

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding dismissal for failure to prosecute is “an especially drastic remedy, reserved for rare occasions” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • holding dismissal for failure to prosecute is “an especially drastic remedy, reserved for rare occasions” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • holding dismissal for failure to prosecute is “an especially drastic remedy, reserved for rare occasions” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • holding dismissal for failure to prosecute is “an especially drastic remedy, reserved for rare occasions” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “Trial-court dismissal of a lawsuit never heard on the merits is a drastic step, normally to be taken only after unfruitful resort to lesser sanctions.”
  • although “[d]ismissal with prejudice is a harsh remedy,” the court has “authority to invoke it for lack of prosecution, both on defendant’s motion and sua sponte”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Friendly, Moore, Oakes, Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.