· 4/19/1991
Herbert Construction Company, Cross-Appellant v. Continental Insurance Company, Cross-Appellee
Citations
- 931 F.2d 989
- 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 7601
- 1991 WL 58793
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- plaintiff must establish reasonable reliance, and duty of inquiry amounts to an alternative way of asking whether reliance was reasonable
- plaintiff must establish reasonable reliance, and duty of inquiry amounts to an alternative way of asking whether reliance was reasonable
- “[T]he existence of ‘apparent authority’ depends upon a factual showing that the third party relied upon the misrepresentations of the agent because of some misleading conduct on the part of the principal – not the agent.”
- where “the agent stole a principal’s indicia of authority and falsely represented to a third party that he had authority to bind the principal,” the principal would not be liable to the third party
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Meskill, Pratt, Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.