Skip to main content
· 4/19/1991

Herbert Construction Company, Cross-Appellant v. Continental Insurance Company, Cross-Appellee

Citations

  • 931 F.2d 989
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 7601
  • 1991 WL 58793

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff must establish reasonable reliance, and duty of inquiry amounts to an alternative way of asking whether reliance was reasonable
  • plaintiff must establish reasonable reliance, and duty of inquiry amounts to an alternative way of asking whether reliance was reasonable
  • “[T]he existence of ‘apparent authority’ depends upon a factual showing that the third party relied upon the misrepresentations of the agent because of some misleading conduct on the part of the principal – not the agent.”
  • where “the agent stole a principal’s indicia of authority and falsely represented to a third party that he had authority to bind the principal,” the principal would not be liable to the third party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meskill, Pratt, Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.