Herberg v. Swartz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• intervening but foreseeable acts of third persons are no defense to liability in negligence
• intervening but foreseeable acts of third persons are no defense to liability in negligence
• refusing to permit a party to raise new errors on appeal and affirming trial court’s refusal to allow a new theory right before the conclusion of trial
• refusing to permit a party to raise new errors on appeal and affirming trial court's refusal to allow a new theory right before the conclusion of trial
• concept of negligence per se permits a court to substitute legislatively required standards of conduct for lesser common law standards of reasonableness
• appellate courts will not review issue, theory or argument not presented at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).