Herbage v. Lollo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• waiving Appellant’s claim of ineffectiveness of derivative PCRA counsel for failure to assert it in response to Rule 907 notice
• stating appellate courts “grant great deference to the factual findings of the PCRA court and will not disturb them unless they have no support in the record.” (citation omitted)
• petitioner must preserve challenge to PCRA counsel’s effectiveness by responding to Rule 907 notice or raising issue while PCRA court retains jurisdiction
• petitioner must preserve challenge to PCRA counsel’s effectiveness by responding to Rule 907 notice or raising issue while PCRA court retains jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).