Supreme Court· 4/30/1945
Herb v. Pitcairn
Citations
- 325 U.S. 77
- 65 S. Ct. 954
- 89 L. Ed. 1483
- 1945 U.S. LEXIS 2690
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding an action is commenced for time limitations purposes when filed in court with no jurisdiction over the matter but with the power to transfer to an appropriate court
- explaining that “[a]n action is ‘commenced’ for [FELA] purposes as a matter of federal law when instituted by service of process issued out of a state court, even if one which itself is unable to proceed to judgment . . . ”
- filing of discrimination complaint in state court without jurisdiction equitably tolled filing requirement
- where action under FELA was commenced in state court without jurisdiction within two year statute of limitations, the statute was tolled
- equitable tolling appropriate where employee filed FELA action in state court without jurisdiction
- equitable tolling appropriate where employee filed FELA action in state court without jurisdiction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jackson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court· 1991-01-22· cited 3,247×
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court· 1974-02-25· cited 2,015×
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court· 1945-06-18· cited 1,894×
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court· 1945-10-08· cited 1,766×
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court· 1964-01-13· cited 1,211×
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 1,036×
- Testa v. KattSupreme Court· 1947-03-10· cited 481×
- Missouri Ex Rel. Southern Railway Co. v. MayfieldSupreme Court· 1950-11-06· cited 172×
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court· 1959-05-04· cited 146×
- Robert K. Oja v. Department of the ArmyFederal Circuit· 2005-04-28· cited 121×
- Oliver L. Jaquay, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsFederal Circuit· 2002-09-16· cited 101×
- Todd Zappone v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 2017-09-07· cited 99×
- Roth v. Northern Assurance Co. Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court· 1964-11-24· cited 82×
- Wilson v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Fifth Circuit· 1991-08-19· cited 79×
- Sloan v. WestNinth Circuit· 1998-04-07· cited 76×
- Farzana K., Individually and as Next Friend of S.K. v. Indiana Department of EducationSeventh Circuit· 2007-01-04· cited 71×
- Arakaki v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2004-09-01· cited 60×
- Kaczmarek v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1978-08-07· cited 57×
- Household Consumer Discount Co. v. VespazianiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-05-30· cited 57×
- United States v. WoodburyNinth Circuit· 1966-03-11· cited 53×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.