Herald Publishing Co. v. Bill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[a] court, when once convinced that it is in error, is not compelled to follow precedent”
• \[a] change in the personnel of the court never furnishes reason to reopen a question of statutory interpretation\
• ‘‘[a] change in the personnel of the court never furnishes reason to reopen a question of statutory interpretation’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).