Her v. Jacquez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prosecutors had absolute immunity for acts that “constituted an exercise of their prosecutorial discretion in preparing a case for indictment and deciding when, where, and how to prosecute”
• holding that prosecutors had absolute immunity when deciding where to arraign criminal defendant because such a decision was made in preparation for a court proceeding where the prosecutors would act as advocates
• holding that prosecutors had absolute immunity when deciding where to arraign a criminal defendant because such a decision was made in preparation for a court proceeding where prosecutors would act as advocates
• holding that ADAs were entitled to absolute immunity for providing direction as to where criminal defendant would be arraigned because this constituted preparation for a court proceeding in which they were acting as advocates
• holding that ADAs’ direction as to where criminal defendant would be arraigned was in preparation for a court proceeding in which the prosecutors were acting as advocates, and ADAs were therefore shielded by absolute immunity
• holding that ADAs’ direction as to where criminal defendant would be arraigned was in preparation for a court proceeding in which the prosecutors were acting as advocates, and ADAs were therefore shielded by absolute immunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).