Hepper v. Triple U Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that trial court clearly abused its discretion in denying a motion for new trial
• concluding that trial court clearly abused its discretion in denying a motion for new trial
• holding that prejudgment interest is improper where the trial court ordered the sums due the prevailing party to be offset by damages due the other party
• holding that prejudgment interest is improper where the trial court ordered the sums due the prevailing party to be offset by damages due the other party
• “Notice of breach by summons and complaint is obviously insufficient since it clearly frustrates the purposes of timely notice.”
• \Notice is an element that must be specifically proven; it is not an affirmative defense\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).