Skip to main content

Henson v. State

Citations

  • 576 P.2d 1352
  • 1978 Alas. LEXIS 627

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that defense counsel’s continuance request that tolled the Rule 45 clock was assumed to have been made on behalf of the defendant and with his consent
  • defendant’s consent to Rule 45 waiver presumed absent “some expression of objection” on the record
  • where continuance requested by defense counsel during hearing and defendant is present, his consent will be presumed in the absence of an objection
  • where continuance requested by defense counsel during hearing and defendant is present, his consent will be presumed in the absence of an objection
  • defendant’s consent to Rule 45 waiver presumed “[a]bsent some expression of objection” on the record
  • strong argument could be made that delay caused by nonappearance resulting from failure of defendant and his attorney to establish a thorough method of communication to assure defendant’s presence when needed would be excluded under Rule 45

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boocheyer, Witz, Connor, Burke, Matthews

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.