Hense v. G.D. Searle & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff did not consent to judgment because the rulings of the trial court effectively precluded her from recovery
• discussing the principle that consent to an adverse judgment generally precludes a litigant from complaining of errors in interlocutory rulings
• a party inviting a final judgment waives right to appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).