Henryk Stefan Drobny v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that an alien’s due process rights were violated by the lack of a translator at his deportation hearing due in part to the fact that the alien’s attorney “did not object to the absence of an interpreter”
• immigration judge did not abuse discretion when he conducted hearing without interpreter, where, inter alia, alien “did not object to the absence of an interpreter”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).