Henry v. Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that issue addressed and resolved at trial and direct appeal is not cognizable in habeas proceeding
• finding that issues raised and decided on direct appeal cannot be considered in habeas proceedings
• “[A] non-jurisdictional issue raised and decided either in the trial court or on direct appeal from the criminal conviction will not be considered in a habeas corpus proceeding.”
• application of Henry precludes review in state habeas of a claim that has already been raised and decided either at trial or on appeal from the criminal conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).