Henry v. Statewide Grievance Committee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding any impropri- ety in relying on allegedly irrelevant factual findings in finding violations of rules of professional conduct necessarily harmless if other evidence existed sufficient to support court’s ultimate findings
• ‘‘[c]ommentaries are routinely used for purposes of persuasive consideration, to guide or assist the court as to the meaning of a rule or statute or for instructive guidance to analyze an issue further’’
• factual findings reviewed under clearly erroneous standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).