Henry v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that, although partial payment can negate an inference of an intention to steal, the State can present sufficient circumstantial evidence of felonious intent if there is “evidence of willful misrepresentations to induce the seller to close on the transaction”
• “By this opinion, we do not mean to express the* view that the state should prosecute as a theft every breach of contract involving the failure to pay money.”
• “By this opinion, we do not mean to express the view that the state should prosecute as a theft every breach of contract involving the failure to pay money.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Izquierdo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-10-28· cited 2×
• Douglas S. Livingston v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-01-07
• JASON MATTHEW SANDERS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-02-05

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pagan v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-04-04· cited 599×
• Segal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-10-10· cited 12×
• Iglesias v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-07-10· cited 8×