Henry v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that as long as one of appellant's attorneys had ten days to prepare for trial, article 1.051(e) was satisfied
• holding that as long as one of appellant’s attorneys had ten days to prepare for trial, article 1.051(e) was satisfied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sanne v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-09-10· cited 169×
• Roney v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-05-05· cited 99×
• Marin v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-12-14· cited 94×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-09-24· cited 23×
• Young v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-01-07· cited 22×
• Criado v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1968-12-18· cited 11×
• Mazratian v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1997-07-31· cited 8×
• Moreno v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-06-01· cited 5×
• Griffin v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-01-10· cited 4×
• Prince v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-10-24· cited 4×
• Gill v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-11-20· cited 4×
• Marin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1993-09-22· cited 3×
• Michelle Thompson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2003-06-12
• Bobby Dean Lacy v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2001-10-25
• Gray v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-01-31
• City of Amarillo v. Bytheway
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1977-01-31