Henry v. Sheffield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• binding non-signatory that was entitled to indemnification and expressly identified as third-party beneficiary to the agreement’s forum-selection clause under several equitable theories, including the closely-related doctrine
• explaining plaintiff’s claims “are related to the Purchase Agreement, the Guarantee, and the transactions contemplated thereby (i.e., the purchase of GlobalScholar) and thus fall within the scope of the mandatory forum-selection clause”
• “[T]he typical [federal forum-non-conveniens] analysis is adjusted when the transfer motion is premised on a forum-selection clause” (citing Atl. Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for the W. Dist. of Tex., 134 S. Ct. 568, 581 (2013))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).