Skip to main content
· 12/13/2005

Henry v. Rehab Plus Inc.

Citations

  • 404 F. Supp. 2d 435
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35855
  • 2005 WL 3434035

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an “omission becomes a misrepresentation only in a situation in which it renders other statements… misleading
  • “However, in New York, privity is no longer required for recovery under a theory of breach of implied warranty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sifton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.