Henry v. Reeser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a nonparty “lack[s] standing to challenge voidable assignments; only the parties to the assignments may seek to avoid such assignments”
• “[W]here a 18 || plaintiff alleges that a document is void due to robo-signing, yet does not contest the validity of 19 || the underlying debt, and is not a party to the assignment, the plaintiff does not have standing to 20 || contest the alleged fraudulent transfer’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).