Skip to main content
· 10/11/1994

Henry v. James

Citations

  • 264 Ga. 527
  • 449 S.E.2d 79
  • 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 3256
  • 1994 Ga. LEXIS 824

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • after the filing of the remittitur, “the [speedy trial] demand [runs] again in its entirety in non-capital cases governed by OCGA § 17-7-170”
  • footnote in case involving a speedy trial issue following remittitur from affirmance in this Court
  • interpreting OCGA § 17-7-171 (b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.