Henry v. Henry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• while past due alimony was vested and subject to full faith and credit, no future alimony would be awardable through URESA because alimony was contrary to the public policy in Texas

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Helmick v. Helmick
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-09-08· cited 21×
• State Ex Rel. Quigley v. Quigley
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-01-31· cited 13×
• State ex rel. Benzing v. Benzing
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-03-13· cited 2×
• Opinion No. (1982)
  Nebraska Attorney General Reports· 1982-01-26

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Estes v. Estes
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1941-04-18· cited 34×
• Lewis v. Lewis
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1888-07-11· cited 30×
• State Ex Rel. Whatley v. Mueller
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1956-03-20· cited 18×
• Ross v. Ross
  New York Family Court· 1954-12-14· cited 12×
• Lenett v. Lutz
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1959-10-09· cited 6×
• Manis v. Genest
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1953-09-14· cited 5×