Henry v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding lender that contracted to inspect \for its own protection” and stipulated it assumed \no responsibility for completion of said building” could not be sued on a breach of warranty of quality
• holding lender that contracted to inspect “for its own protection” and stipulated it assumed “no responsibility for completion of said building” could not be sued on a breach of warranty of quality
• holding lender that contracted to inspect “for its own protection” and stipulated it assumed “no responsibility for completion of said building” could not be sued on a breach of warranty of quality
• affirming summary judgment and finding evidence of alleged prior oral representations were barred by the parol evidence rule upon finding that, even in absence of integration clause, -written loan agreement was complete as to such matters
• affirming summary judgment and finding evidence of alleged prior oral representations were barred by the parol evidence rule upon finding that, even in absence of integration clause, written loan agreement was complete as to such matters
• affirming summary judgment and finding evidence of alleged prior oral representations were barred by the parol evidence rule upon finding that even In absence of integration clause, written loan agreement was complete as to such matters

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).