Henry v. Diviney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the trial court’s determination that a physician’s expert testimony was reliable given the physician’s extensive background “providing child abuse evaluations for detecting and investigating child sexual abuse in hundreds of cases”
• relying upon trial testimony to affirm ruling that expert was qualified
• only acts that are “attributable to the husband-wife relation” are subject to the evidentiary privilege (quotation omitted)
• doctor's lack of specialization in a particular field did not disqualify her from offering an expert opinion under Rule 702 based on her general education, training, and experience
• interpreting N.H. R. Evid. 504

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).