Henry v. Benyo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that where “an employee’s work-related injuries are caused by a third-party, . . . subsection (h) does not apply because the employer is not ‘liable’ for the accident” (emphasis added)
• stating that “losses that are not covered by workers’ compensation” include “pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, [and] loss of consortium”
• holding that “[t]he plain language of subsection (h
• hesitating to “rely upon decisions which the issuing court has not deemed suitable for official publication”
• hesitating to \rely upon decisions which the issuing court has not deemed suitable for official publication\
• “When the legislative intent of a statute’s terms is clear, we will apply, not construe, its plain language.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).