Skip to main content
· 3/29/1967

Henry S. Cram v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd., Robert S. Wahab, Jr. v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.

Citations

  • 375 F.2d 670
  • 11 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1236
  • 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6944

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \the intent of the parties to an ambiguous contract is a question of fact which cannot properly be resolved on motions for summary judgment.\ Id. at 674
  • “the intent of the parties to an ambiguous contract is a question of fact which cannot properly be resolved on motions for summary judgment”
  • “the intent of the parties to an ambiguous contract is a question of fact which cannot properly be resolved on motions for summary judgment.” Id. at 674

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haynsworth, Bell, Winter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.