Skip to main content
· 11/25/1991

Henry Platsky v. Central Intelligence Agency, Henry Platsky v. U.S. Department of Justice, Fbi and Department of Defense, Defense Intelligence Agency

Citations

  • 953 F.2d 26
  • 21 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 97
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 27989

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a district court should not have dismissed a pro se plaintiff’s complaints without affording him leave to replead
  • “[J]urisdictional limitations permit a plaintiff to sue only the federal government officials responsible for violating the plaintiff’s constitutional rights; a plaintiff cannot sue the agency for which the officials work.”
  • “[I]n Bivens actions, jurisdictional limitations permit a plaintiff to sue only the federal government officials responsible for violating the plaintiffs constitutional rights; a plaintiff cannot sue the agency for which the officials work”
  • district courts must construe pro se Complaints liberally

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cardamone, Per Curiam, Pierce, Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.