Henry Lochte Co. v. Lefebvre
Citations
- 124 La. 244
- 50 So. 26
- 1909 La. LEXIS 459
Syllabus
<p>1. Pleading (§ 72*) — Peayek fob Relief-Abandonment of Right.</p> <p>The prayer for general relief gave a right to interveners to a judgment recognizing their pledge and pawn claimed in the body of the petition.</p> <p>2. Pledge and Pawn Properly Recorded.</p> <p>The act of pledge and pawn, having been properly recorded in the parish of Iberville, is recognized on the crop made in that parish.</p> <p>3. Agriculture (§ 12*) — Liens—Record.</p> <p>The act of pledge and pawn not having been properly recorded in the parish of West Baton Rouge, it does not secure the pledge and pawn; it secures a privilege similar to that which plaintiffs, Lochte & Co., have.</p> <p>4. Pleading (§ 129*) — Imputations of Payment-Failure to Question — Effeot.</p> <p>Imputations of payment not questioned by pleading remain unchanged.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining why Nevada’s catch-all four-year limitations period applies and 22 the three- and five-year provisions are inapplicable
- explaining why Nevada’s catch-all four-year limitations period applies and 20 the three- and five-year provisions are inapplicable
- explaining why Nevada’s catch-all four-year limitations period applies and the three- and 22 five-year provisions are inapplicable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Breaux
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.