Skip to main content
· 2/4/2026

Henry Lee Jones v. State of Tennessee

Syllabus

This matter is before the Court upon the application of the Petitioner, Henry Lee Jones, for an extraordinary appeal pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Appellate Procedure 10. The Petitioner seeks review of the trial court's order denying his motion to disqualify the Attorney General's Office from representing the State in his capital post-conviction proceeding. The Petitioner raises numerous constitutional and statutory challenges to 2023 Tenn. Pub. Acts ch. 182 (\the Act\), which gives the Attorney General \exclusive control over the state's defense of the request for collateral review\ in capital cases. The State has responded in opposition to the application, arguing that the Petitioner lacks standing to challenge the Act and, alternatively, that the Petitioner has failed to establish that this case merits extraordinary review. For the reasons set forth below, the Petitioner's application is hereby denied.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding defendant waived issue when he filed motion to withdraw guilty plea after the court decided post-sentence motions
  • “[T]his Court is required to docket a pro se notice of appeal even when the defendant is represented by counsel[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Presiding Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer, Judge Camille R. McMullen, Judge Matthew J. Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.