Henry L. Gardner v. Erik K. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that VA’s duty to assist applies to all elements of a claim, including establishing veteran status
• vacating and remanding a Board decision that addressed common law insanity rather than VA's regulatory definition
• questioning whether Disabled Am. Veterans v. Sec’y of Veterans Affairs, 327 F.3d 1339, 1346-48 (Fed.Cir.2003), permits the Board to address the merits of a claim after reversing an RO decision declining to reopen the claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).