· 5/18/2004
Henry L. Davis v. Con-Way Transportation Central Express, Inc., Now Known as Con-Way Central Express, Inc.
Citations
- 368 F.3d 776
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 9630
- 93 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1409
- 2004 WL 1095758
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- disregarding comments from those who recommended adverse action but who were not ultimate decisionmaker
- “The focus of a pretext inquiry is whether the employer’s stated reason was honest, not whether it was accurate, wise, or well-considered.”
- “Nor are we any more convinced . . . that actions and state- ments by non-decisionmakers reveal the pretextual nature of Con-Way’s decision.”
- “The focus of a pretext inquiry is whether the employer’s stated reason was honest, not whether it was accurate, wise, or well-considered.”
- “A decision-maker is the person responsible for the contested decision.”
- “A decisionmaker is the person responsible for the contested decision.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Kanne, Manion
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.