Skip to main content
· 10/31/1957

Henry Hayes v. United States

Citations

  • 249 F.2d 516
  • 102 U.S. App. D.C. 1
  • 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 4030

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]f the sentence were invalid and defendant 8 successfully attacked it, he could be validly resentenced though the resentence increased the punishment.”
  • “[I]f the sentence were invalid and defendant successfully attacked it, he could be validly resentenced though the resentence increased the punishment.”
  • “True it is that defendant had begun to serve time; but as we read [Bozza v. United States, 330 U.S. 160 (1947)] this time was not lawful punishment the augmentation of which, to make the sentence equal to the statutory penalty, constituted double jeopardy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bazelon, Fahy, Washington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.