· 10/31/1957
Henry Hayes v. United States
Citations
- 249 F.2d 516
- 102 U.S. App. D.C. 1
- 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 4030
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]f the sentence were invalid and defendant 8 successfully attacked it, he could be validly resentenced though the resentence increased the punishment.”
- “[I]f the sentence were invalid and defendant successfully attacked it, he could be validly resentenced though the resentence increased the punishment.”
- “True it is that defendant had begun to serve time; but as we read [Bozza v. United States, 330 U.S. 160 (1947)] this time was not lawful punishment the augmentation of which, to make the sentence equal to the statutory penalty, constituted double jeopardy.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bazelon, Fahy, Washington
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.